I would often tell my friends that religion has done a lot for me. While I don't go to a regular worship service these days (not a lot of Quaker Buddhists around, y'know), I think a lot about religious matters and I've worked hard to come up with a spiritual framework that works for me. I find the descriptor "spiritual but not religious" to be a bit pompous, and I believe that religious ritual and regular worship services have done a lot for billions of people throughout history.
I was raised Presbyterian, but by parents who weren't especially attached to that belief system. My church gave me a sense of community that I greatly appreciated. I still carry a keychain that I was given at my confirmation, despite not considering myself a Christian today, because I fondly remember that day. It says something to the effect of "The Lord God is with you wherever you go".
As a child I always had questions about things I was taught in Sunday school that made no sense to me, and as I got older I began to seriously question these beliefs. I kept the beliefs I liked, shed those I didn't, and eventually ended up somewhere quite different. I understand that some people don't like to think too hard about religion, and that's fine with me. Non-religious people can have entirely fulfilling lives. But if your religious beliefs ARE important to you, I feel that you should take a long hard look at them.
At the top of my Blogger page there's a link that says "Next Blog", which seems to link to a random blog every time you click it. As I shuffle through my fellow writers about every fourth site is overwhemingly Christian in focus. They seem to demonstrate a particularly American approach to Christianity that makes me quite uncomfortable. Most entries crow on and on about feeling the presence of God in your life, and how God loves us all, and I'm so glad I'm saved and touchy feely hoodlydoo. At the same time, nobody ever seems to examine the stranger elements of Christian theology. When theology is discussed on these pages, it boils down to this:
Q: Someone has a suggestion for me that seems to contradict what I read in the bible. What should I do?
A: Deny that suggestion immediately. THE BOOK IS TRUTH! PRAISE GOD!
Now if you're going to wrap yourself up in the snuggly blanket of "God loves me and everything will work out", good for you. I'm not going to comment on your blog about the theological chip on my shoulder and rain on your parade. The problem is when people become openly hostile to the very notion that other people may promote different beliefs. If you feel so secure in the TRUTH of your beliefs that you need to shout down others, why are you so frightened to ask the tough questions of yourself?
I don't treat my religious beliefs any differently from my political stances or ethical principles. They are conclusions that I've reached, and I subject them to the same scrutiny. I question my beliefs constantly, refine them as needed, and feel more confident as a result. I wouldn't dare say that those beliefs are TRUE, and to do so smacks of unbelievable arrogance.
In American law there is a recognition that legislation may conflict with some Americans' religious beliefs. For example, if a law outlaws discrimination against homosexuals, it would hold businesses accountable if they fired employees for being gay. However, churches that condemn homosexuality would be legally allowed to fire an employee (pastor, deacon, etc) for coming out of the closet. They are allowed to do this because the First Amendment reigns supreme and prevents the law from impacting their religious practice. Would the Boy Scouts be allowed to fire troop leaders who come out as gay? An interesting question. Do they qualify for religious protection?
What worries me about the religion loophole is that it provides a safe haven for people who possess harmful beliefs. Now I'm not going to argue that churches should be told who they can or can't hire or fire. A law to that effect would be unjust. It does make me uncomfortable when people argue that they can do whatever they want as long as they couch it in religious terms. I believe the following principles to be true:
1) No just law will prevent a person from living their own life the way they want to live it provided that their choices don't negatively affect other people.
2) No sensible religion will mandate actions that have any negative effect on the lives of people not affiliated with that religion.
I like to think that these principles make sense when applied in the modern world:
-If your religion requires the outlawing of other faiths, or a restriction on their practice, then your religion is not sensible and you should change it.
- If your religion commands you to not use contraception, then don't. No problem there. If your religion demands a law preventing people outside your faith from using contraception, then your religion is not sensible and you should change it.
- If your religion prohibits you from receiving a blood transfusion, then fine. If your religion demands that your severely ill child not be given a life-saving blood transfusion, then bollocks to you. Another person cannot ethically be refused a life saving treatment because of YOUR religious beliefs. Your religion is not sensible, and you should change it.
|What's that, Derpy Dash? Persecute|
Perhaps you can see my difficulty in maintaining an open mind about Christians that I meet. There are many degrees of Christian, just as there are many degrees of every faith. When I visit someone's house and see JESUS plastered all over their wall, I am instantly afraid. But I keep my thoughts to myself. I smile politely. I get to know that person, and frequently find them to be open-minded, interesting people. I try, I really do. With all the crazy people in the world, it's very difficult.